Print-ready by construction
Capacity-aware writing and native PPTX rendering prevent overflow, overlap, and unreadably small text.
Multi-agent paper-to-poster generation
Fix the structure first, then write to fit. PosterMELD turns one paper into multiple valid poster designs while preserving evidence, editability, and print-readiness.
01 · Overview
Scientific poster construction compresses a long multimodal paper into one readable, editable canvas. Existing systems can hide request-level failures by scoring only completed outputs, while direct image generation does not preserve element-level editability.
PosterMELD inverts the usual workflow. Capacity-aware slots guide writing before rendering; specialized agents select evidence, compose visuals, and export native PowerPoint elements. Deterministic gates and VLM review route only failed aspects to a bounded repair loop.
Capacity-aware writing and native PPTX rendering prevent overflow, overlap, and unreadably small text.
Template, style, density, background, and seed controls produce meaningful alternatives instead of accidental variation.
A 621-paper benchmark reports request-level Print-Ready Rate alongside conditional CHE, content fidelity, editability, and cost.
02 · Method
Paper understanding, template-conditioned writing, reusable skills, native rendering, and bounded repair operate as one auditable pipeline.
MinerU extracts text, figures, tables, and document structure while provenance remains attached to every asset.
Template slot contracts expose geometry, reading order, prominence, character budgets, and compatible visual types.
Content, template, layout, and visual agents select keypoints and place evidence against known spatial constraints.
Deterministic gates and VLM critics inspect grounding, overflow, readability, visual quality, and occupancy before acceptance.
03 · Controlled diversity
The final paper compares five domains. PosterMELD changes layout topology, typography, palette, density, and text-figure allocation while keeping every output natively editable.
PosterMELD outputs from the paper
04 · Template library
05 · Benchmark and evaluation
The benchmark spans 14 publication-source groups and ten research domains. PosterMELD evaluates whether each request produces a usable poster before reporting conditional visual and content scores.
Request-level validity across geometry, readability, asset integrity, and obvious factual errors.
Paper-grounded keypoints, evidence coverage, and figure-text consistency.
Craftsmanship, Harmony, and Expressiveness are scored only for print-ready outputs.
Mean generation cost includes failed requests instead of hiding them from the denominator.
End-to-end comparison
All metrics use the shared 621-paper request set. Missing generations remain in the denominator.
| Method | PRR ↑ | CHE ↑ | Universal ↑ | Editable | Cost ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-Image-2 | 85.2% | 2.698 | 4.948 | No | $0.18 |
| Codex+Skill | 82.8% | 2.716 | 4.876 | Yes | $10.78 |
| P2P | 24.2% | 3.071 | 4.033 | No | $0.35 |
| PosterGen | 15.8% | 3.163 | 3.901 | Yes | $0.28 |
| PosterMELD | 81.3% | 3.247 | 4.456 | Yes | $0.38 |
| Human reference | 98.7% | 3.287 | 4.995 | Yes | — |
PRR is request-level print readiness. CHE is conditional on print-ready outputs. Universal assigns zero to missing generations. Cost is the mean U.S. dollars per request, including failures.
Open source
Start with a standard template, then control style, density, background, and review depth from the command line.